tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post110455117307090093..comments2023-10-29T10:32:36.914-04:00Comments on Philosophy, et cetera: 2004: My Web of BeliefsRichard Y Chappellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16725218276285291235noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post-1136181602472392542006-01-02T01:00:00.000-05:002006-01-02T01:00:00.000-05:00I didn't have time to read all the links. But I'v...I didn't have time to read all the links. But I've glad you've come on board the externalist position within epistemology. Have you read Williamson's <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/019925656X/qid=1136181343/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/102-8080162-2310513?v=glance&s=books&n=507846" REL="nofollow"><I>Knowledge and Its Limits</I></A> yet?<BR/><BR/>With regards to the religion issue, I'd be interested in you taking up atheistic ethics not in terms of what grounds ethics or what ethics is or even whether a person is ethic, but why a person would want to be ethic. You touched on it very, very briefly in the post you link to. But it does seem that most theists can offer fairly compelling arguments here. (As can quasi-theists who accept some kind of immortality such as Buddhists or Platonists)<BR/><BR/>Good, interesting post. A summary like this is always worth doing and its a nice collection of your good links as well.Clark Goblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03876620613578404474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post-1104677823842162142005-01-02T09:57:00.000-05:002005-01-02T09:57:00.000-05:00Great post idea Richard, it inspired me in part to...Great post idea Richard, it inspired me in part to write this: <A HREF="http://www.blogger.com/r?http%3A%2F%2Fillusivemind.blogspot.com%2F2005%2F01%2Fi-believe-not.html">I believe, not</A>  <br /><br /><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A><A HREF="http://www.blogger.com/r?http%3A%2F%2Fillusivemind.blogspot.com%2F" TITLE="illusive_mind at hotmail dot com">Illusive Mind</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com