tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post8922731280242753220..comments2023-10-29T10:32:36.914-04:00Comments on Philosophy, et cetera: Framing AltruismRichard Y Chappellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16725218276285291235noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post-63324512004361569622007-08-21T13:51:00.000-04:002007-08-21T13:51:00.000-04:00It's been done. Not with "Stinginess" or "Dupe" i...It's been done. Not with "Stinginess" or "Dupe" in the Dictator Game, but with a Prisoner's Dilemma titled "Wall Street Game" or "Community Game." The former led to about 1/3 cooperation, the latter about 2/3. (I can't find the original paper online, but <A HREF="http://faculty.babson.edu/krollag/org_site/soc_psych/ross_naive_real.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>'s a decent description.) As you said, it is about framing and schemas (or <I>construal</I>, as the social psychologists who conducted the study put it).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post-52035538248867446262007-08-20T15:18:00.000-04:002007-08-20T15:18:00.000-04:00Benoit Hardy-Vallée seems to be making a very comm...Benoit Hardy-Vallée seems to be making a very common mistake of assuming anythign that changes our decision process must be doing so for a logical reason. when in reality its mostly just as you describe.<BR/><BR/>Rather like david blain guesing which box you are goin to choose to keep in his magic show.Geniushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11624496692217466430noreply@blogger.com