tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post114569561297884948..comments2010-03-16T09:34:24.284-04:00Richardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16725218276285291235r.chappell@gmail.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post-1150105024309887142006-06-12T05:37:04.310-04:002006-06-12T05:37:04.310-04:00<B>Update:</B> I should clarify the "rigid designators bad!" remark. I had in mind the typical examples (e.g. natural kind terms, proper names), where the secondary intentions are rigid whereas the primary intensions are not. However, <I>super-rigid</I> terms are okay, i.e. where both primary and secondary intentions are rigid. E.g. numbers.Richardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16725218276285291235noreply@blogger.com