tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post114569561297884948..comments2008-10-12T22:17:00.524-04:00Comments on Philosophy, et cetera: Limited OmniscienceRichardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16725218276285291235r.chappell@gmail.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6642011.post-1150105024309887142006-06-12T05:37:00.000-04:002006-06-12T05:37:00.000-04:002006-06-12T05:37:00.000-04:00Update: I should clarify the "rigid designators ba...<B>Update:</B> I should clarify the "rigid designators bad!" remark. I had in mind the typical examples (e.g. natural kind terms, proper names), where the secondary intentions are rigid whereas the primary intensions are not. However, <I>super-rigid</I> terms are okay, i.e. where both primary and secondary intentions are rigid. E.g. numbers.Richardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16725218276285291235noreply@blogger.com