There's a cool paper by Thomas Kroedel on 'Dualist Mental Causation and the Exclusion Problem', forthcoming in Nous. The central idea is very much akin to that discussed in my 2011 blog post 'Epiphenomenal Explanations'. As with the previously noted case of Kagan on Consequentialism and Individual Impact, I guess it just goes to show that I should hurry up and turn more of my blog posts into journal articles!
It does seem a bit of a shame, though, that that's the only way to get professional credit for one's ideas. As I've argued before, blogging is an excellent medium for doing philosophy, and while some ideas benefit from the sustained exposition possible in a lengthy journal article, I think it's at least as common to read papers that would benefit from being distilled into blog posts! So I think it's unfortunate, generally speaking, that our professional incentives are set up the way that they are. (Not that it's at all clear what feasible alternatives there are... Any thoughts?)